Year 6 — Writing
Construct a clear argument with well-organised points and evidence, write to persuade using a full range of techniques, and write a genuinely BALANCED argument weighing both sides fairly.
A BALANCED argument doesn't just mention the opposing view briefly — it genuinely weighs both sides with fair evidence for each, before reaching a reasoned conclusion. This is different from a one-sided persuasive piece, which openly favours one side throughout.
“Some argue school should start later, citing research on teenage sleep patterns. Others argue an earlier start better matches family schedules and daylight hours. Weighing both, the sleep research evidence appears stronger, as it directly affects learning ability.”
Notice both sides get genuine, specific evidence (sleep research; family schedules and daylight), not just a token mention — this is what makes it a genuinely BALANCED argument, ending with a reasoned, evidence-based conclusion rather than an emotional one.
Is this a balanced argument or one-sided persuasion?
"Some believe homework helps reinforce learning, citing improved test scores. Others argue it reduces family time and causes stress, citing wellbeing research. Both concerns deserve serious consideration."
💡 Both sides receive specific evidence and are treated as worth serious consideration.
"Homework is clearly harmful and should be banned immediately — there's no good reason to keep it."
💡 This dismisses the opposing view entirely without genuine consideration.
"While uniforms promote equality, some argue they limit self-expression — a fair concern worth weighing against the benefits."
💡 Both the benefit (equality) and the concern (self-expression) are genuinely acknowledged.
Why might a genuinely balanced argument sometimes be MORE useful to a reader than a one-sided persuasive piece, even if it's less emotionally powerful?
Identify whether this is balanced or one-sided.
You are writing about whether students should have longer lunch breaks.
Which approach is genuinely balanced?
💡 Look for the option that genuinely considers evidence on both sides.
Identify balanced argument versus one-sided persuasion.
"There's simply no argument against banning junk food adverts — anyone who disagrees hasn't thought it through."
"While some worry a ban limits business freedom, the health evidence for restricting junk food adverts to children is compelling."
A strong persuasive piece typically uses...
In one word, what should a balanced argument do to BOTH sides before reaching a conclusion?
💡 It's the key verb used throughout the Understand section.
Why is dismissing the opposing view without evidence a weakness in an argument?
"Both perspectives raise valid points, but the evidence for X is ultimately stronger." is an example of...
Read the passage, then answer the questions below.
Should students be allowed to use mobile phones at school? Supporters argue phones allow emergency contact with parents and can support learning through educational apps. Opponents argue phones are a significant distraction and can enable cyberbullying. Weighing the evidence, the risk of distraction and bullying appears to outweigh the benefits, though a compromise — allowing phones only at specific times — may address both concerns.
What evidence is given in favour of allowing phones?
💡 Look at the 'Supporters argue' sentence.
Does the passage reach a one-sided or a reasoned, balanced conclusion?
What compromise does the passage suggest?
💡 It's mentioned at the end of the passage.
Write a balanced argument paragraph (five to six sentences) about whether school should start later, genuinely weighing evidence on both sides before reaching a reasoned conclusion.
A quick mastery check — 3 questions.
A balanced argument should...
"There's no possible argument against this — it's simply obvious." is an example of...
Constructing a strong argument means organising points with...